Which of the following best describes a common scenario for a premises liability claim?

A common scenario for a premises liability claim typically involves an individual suffering harm as a result of hazardous conditions present on someone else's property. In the given context, a slip and fall due to icy steps at a rental property directly aligns with the principles of premises liability.

In these cases, property owners have a legal duty to ensure that their premises are safe for visitors and to address any known hazards. If someone slips and falls on icy steps, it can be argued that the property owner failed to adequately maintain the premises or warn individuals of the dangerous condition, resulting in injury. This scenario exemplifies how premises liability law operates: it focuses on the responsibility of property owners to prevent injuries caused by unsafe conditions.

Other scenarios mentioned—such as a car accident, unsafe construction scaffolding, or wrongful termination—do not pertain to premises liability. Car accidents relate to motor vehicle law, unsafe scaffolding falls are typically governed by workplace safety regulations, and wrongful termination entails employment law issues rather than property safety. Therefore, the situation involving icy steps at a rental property accurately reflects the essence of premises liability claims.