What types of evidence are generally inadmissible in Ohio courts?

In Ohio courts, hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible unless it falls under a recognized exception to the hearsay rule. Hearsay refers to statements made outside of court used to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The rationale behind this rule is that hearsay statements lack the reliability and the opportunity for cross-examination, which are essential for evaluating evidence in a courtroom setting.

Ohio law does provide a variety of exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as statements made under the belief of imminent death, business records, and excited utterances, among others. If a hearsay statement does fit into one of these exceptions, it may be admitted as evidence despite the general prohibition. This nuanced approach balances the need for reliable evidence with the flexibility to admit certain out-of-court statements that possess a degree of trustworthiness.

In contrast, expert testimony, direct evidence, and circumstantial evidence are typically admissible in court, provided they meet the relevant legal standards for relevance and reliability.