What does "strict liability" in product liability cases in Ohio imply for manufacturers and sellers?

Strict liability in product liability cases in Ohio is a legal doctrine that imposes responsibility on manufacturers and sellers for defective products without the need for the injured party to prove negligence or fault. This means that if a product is found to be defective and causes harm, the manufacturer or seller can still be held liable simply based on the existence of the defect and the resulting injury, regardless of whether they acted with care or intended to cause harm.

This principle is fundamental in product liability law as it aims to protect consumers by holding companies accountable for the safety of the products they sell. It reflects a public policy decision that manufacturers and sellers are in a better position to bear the costs associated with defects, as they are responsible for product design, manufacturing, and marketing. This shifts the burden of proof from the injured party to the manufacturer or seller, thereby simplifying the process for consumers seeking compensation for damages caused by defective products.

In contrast, the other options involve concepts that do not reflect the core tenet of strict liability. For instance, requiring manufacturers to prove a product's safety is not consistent with strict liability, as the burden does not lie with the manufacturer in this context. The notion of suing for emotional distress only does not capture the essence of strict liability,